lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/9] media: adv7180: add support for NEWAVMODE
From
Date


On 07/25/2016 12:36 PM, Ian Arkver wrote:
> On 25/07/16 18:55, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>> On 07/25/2016 05:04 AM, Ian Arkver wrote:
>>> On 23/07/16 18:00, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>> +#define ADV7180_VSYNC_FIELD_CTL_1_NEWAVMODE 0x02
>>> See below re this value.
>>>
>> Hi Ian, I double-checked the ADV7180 datasheet, this value is
>> correct. Bit 4, when cleared, _enables_ NEWAVMODE.
>
> Hah, ok. I'm not familiar enough with the history of this chip and didn't
> know what "OLDAVMODE" was. So, to enable NEWAVMODE you clear
> the NEWAVMODE bit. That makes perfect sense.
>
> Anyway, I still don't see what NEWAVMODE gets you.

Hi Ian,

With video standard auto-detect disabled in the chip (VID_SEL > 2),
captured NTSC
images by the i.mx6q SabreAuto are corrupted, best I can describe it as
"extremely
fuzzy". Only when newavmode is enabled do the images look good again, in
manual
mode. With auto-detect enabled, images look good with or without newavmode.

The strange this is, the auto-detected standard is identical to the
standard set
explicitly in manual mode (NTSC-M). I did a complete i2c dump of the
registers
for both auto-detect and manual mode, and found no other differences besides
the auto-detect/manual setting.

Trying to track this down further would probably require a logic
analyzer on the
bt.656 bus, which I don't have access to.

I will not be debugging this further so NEWAVMODE it will have to remain.

Steve



> As
> far as I can see it just locks down the timings and removes the
> flexibility
> the chip otherwise offers to move the BT656 SAV and EAV codes around
> relative to the incoming video.
>
> In what circumstances would you need to set the newavmode property
> and change this default behaviour? We're not coupling the adv7180
> back-to-back with an ADV video encoder here, which is what
> NEWAVMODE is for and is presumably why AD recommend it for their
> eval boards. We're trying to get a BT656 compliant stream, which is
> what the default mode purports to generate.
>
> Regards,
> IanJ
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-26 00:41    [W:0.028 / U:3.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site