lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8
Hi Linus,

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:45:53 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Actually, the perf tree on its own was enough to trigger the build
> > problem, the luto-next tree was just what initially triggered the build
> > failure in linux-next (I guess there is some missing dependency).
> > After the build failed, I started including the perf tree directly
> > before the tip tree and the build would fail when I merged that ...
>
> Ugh. It's merged in my tree now, because I thought it was ok. Can
> somebody point me to the fix?

I only affects cross building of the objtool and vdso2c tools (which is
how I work). The latest version of the perf/core branch in the tip
tree now has all the fixes, so I assume that Ingo will send another
pull request.

Unfortunately, that means that your tree is broken for me this
morning ... but I will cope, I guess.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-26 00:41    [W:0.038 / U:2.880 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site