lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] Decouple X86_32 dependency from the ISA Kconfig option
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 12:17:07PM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:18:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:48:42AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> >Ah, ok, so it's for enabling real hardware, not just a cleanup, right? You might
> >> >want to put that info into the boilerplate mail or so.
> >> >
> >> >I'm perfectly fine with all the patches that touch x86 code:
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> >> >
> >> >I suppose you'd like to have these in the driver tree, all in one place?
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Ingo
> >>
> >> Ah yes, in retrospect I should have made it clear that this was for
> >> supporting hardware rather than simply code cleanup. That was an
> >> oversight on my part not to have made it more explicit.
> >>
> >> Introducing everything to the driver tree would be most convenient, thus
> >> allowing me to quickly release my subsequent patches which will be
> >> rebased on top of these.
> >
> >Ok, I can take these.
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >greg k-h
>
> Forgive me for probing again; what is that status of this patchset? I'm
> anxious to see them accepted to prevent the regression introduced by the
> ISA_BUS configuration option from appearing in the next merge window.

Not all of these patches had anything to do with the subject of this 0/4
patch, and seem to have gone in through other trees.

So can you resend just the patches that are for this series that have
not been picked up?

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-01 23:41    [W:0.044 / U:0.704 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site