lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues
    On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> wrote:
    > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:03:43PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
    >> That's not feasible. Think of dynamic libraries or just-in-time
    >> compilers. What instruction set does /usr/bin/java use, for instance? :)
    >
    > The java argument is true. In that case or when the bitmask is missing, we can allocate for all supported features.
    >

    I actually want to see us moving in the direction of unconditionally
    allocating everything on process startup. If we can stop using CR0.TS
    entirely, I think everything will be better.

    --Andy

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2016-04-29 22:41    [W:4.076 / U:0.248 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site