lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] select_idle_sibling experiments
On Sat, 09 Apr, at 01:30:34PM, Chris Mason wrote:
>
> [ nohz throttling patch ]
>
> I tested the nohz throttle two different ways, first with schbench's
> pipe simulation, it's easily 8% faster with messages bouncing between
> cpus.
>
> In production it's hard to pick a single number because the benchmarks
> produce latency curves as the workload scales up in RPS. The benefits
> range from 2-9% depending on the metric. It's a nice win, and I'd love to
> see it go in.

Do we have any idea what the tradeoff is against power consumption for
throttling nohz?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-13 00:01    [W:2.909 / U:1.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site