Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 09 Mar 2016 18:19:21 +0100 | From | Daniel Borkmann <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 9 (net: bpf) |
| |
On 03/09/2016 06:07 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 03/09/16 08:48, Daniel Borkmann wrote: >> On 03/09/2016 05:44 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On 03/08/16 21:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Changes since 20160308: >>> >>> on x86_64: >>> >>> ../net/core/filter.c: In function 'bpf_skb_get_tunnel_opt': >>> ../net/core/filter.c:1824:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ip_tunnel_info_opts_get' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>> ip_tunnel_info_opts_get(to, info); >>> ^ >>> ../net/core/filter.c: In function 'bpf_skb_set_tunnel_opt': >>> ../net/core/filter.c:1918:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ip_tunnel_info_opts_set' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>> ip_tunnel_info_opts_set(info, from, size); >>> ^ >>> Full randconfig file is attached. >> >> Already fixed with net-next commit e28e87ed474c ("ip_tunnel, bpf: >> ip_tunnel_info_opts_{get, set} depends on CONFIG_INET"). [...] > Is that patch on the netdev mailing list or patchwork? > I can't find it.
It is in patchwork archive or also here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=e28e87ed474c5a0b378c66fb85efc8e487f4f63f
Was reported first by Fengguang's build bot i.e. his config had !CONFIG_INET like in your case, so should resolve the issue.
Thanks, Daniel
| |