Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/23] tracing: 'hist' triggers | From | Tom Zanussi <> | Date | Wed, 09 Mar 2016 09:04:28 -0600 |
| |
Hi Steve,
On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 09:44 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:54:40 -0600 > Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > This is v16 of the 'hist triggers' patchset. > > > > This version incorporates a couple changes suggested by Steve. > > > > Patch 1 can be merged into patch 8 from v13, 'tracing: Add lock-free > > tracing_map'. Following the v13 suggestions, I made a couple changes > > to the tracing map constants to clarify the field relationships, and > > added a couple missing comments I noticed while at it. > > > > Hi Tom! > > I tested this, played with it a little, and I think it's pretty much > ready to go. But I'm very nervous about sending this to Linux-next this > late in the current rc cycle. I would like this in next for a full > cycle before sending it to Linus. > > Thus, I'm going to push everything up to but excluding: > > tracing: Add lock-free tracing_map > > The hist tree that I tested and played with is on my repo in > ftrace/hist branch. > > I'll push this to linux-next after 4.6-rc1 is released, and then we can > get it into the 4.7 merge window. > > Does that sound fine to you? >
Yeah, it's been kicking around for a couple years now, so one more cycle won't hurt. ;-) (and I do think it having it soak in linux-next for a full cycle makes a lot of sense).
Thanks for all your review and testing!
Tom
> -- Steve
| |