lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 11/12] certs: Add a secondary system keyring that can be added to dynamically [ver #2]
Date
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> but we're left with a lot of references to "system_trusted" (eg.
> restrict_link_to_system_trusted, depends on SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING

How about I pluralise it to SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRINGS? The fact that one is
called builtin and the other secondary doesn't detract from the fact that
they're both system-wide rings of trusted keys.

Or would you prefer .system_trusted_keys and .secondary_trusted_keys? Even
though the second is also a "system" trusted keyring.

David

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-08 15:01    [W:0.235 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site