Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:54:50 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND] Documentation: devicetree: Clean up gpio-keys example | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> |
| |
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote: > Drop #address-cells and #size-cells, which are not required by the > gpio-keys binding documentation, as button sub-nodes are not devices. > > Reported-by: Julien Chauveau <chauveau.julien@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt > index 21641236c095..1552a11f6786 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt > @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ Example nodes: > > gpio_keys { > compatible = "gpio-keys"; > - #address-cells = <1>; > - #size-cells = <0>; > autorepeat; > button@21 {
FYI, with "[PATCH] scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version 53bf130b1cdd": (http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg117206.html) applied:
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /keyboard/button@21 has a unit name, but no reg property
> label = "GPIO Key UP";
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |