Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:34:19 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update | From | Doug Anderson <> |
| |
Thierry,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@google.com> wrote: > So just to summarize: > > * Add pwm_get_state(), pwm_apply_state(), pwm_get_args(). > pwm_get_state() initially returns 0 for duty cycle if driver doesn't > support readout. > > * Re-implement pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions) > atop pwm_get_state() as you describe earlier in the thread. > > * Document pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions) as deprecated. > > * Fix drivers for all current 2 users of PWM regulator to support > hardware readout. > > * Update PWM regulator as you described earlier in the thread (Feb 23). > > * If PWM regulator is ever used on a new board whose PWM doesn't > support hardware readout, the voltage will change at probe time. > > > Did I get all that right? Thanks!
Can you provide a "yes, you got that right" or a "no, you didn't understand"? That will unblock Boris, I think.
-Doug
| |