Messages in this thread | | | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Date | Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:05:50 -0600 | Subject | Re: user namespace and fully visible proc and sys mounts |
| |
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote: >> Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> writes: >> >>> On a related note, can we *please* find a way to constrain namespace >>> creation in a way that might satisfy the RHEL crowd? >> >> I am not certain to what you are referrring. >> >> As long as folks are willing to work with me I am happy to help design >> and design something that makes things better for everyone. If someone >> pushes hard, suggestes crappy patches, and does not listen to >> constructive feedback I will shoot their patches down (especially when I >> am sick and tired as I have been more than I would like this development >> cycle). > > I think we should add some mechanism that will allow the right to > create various namespaces to be constrained in a useful and usable > manner. I'll start a new thread.
On the general principle that there is more attack surface, and attack surface reduction is generally good I agree. I will await your follow on thread when you are ready.
Eric
| |