Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Mar 2016 16:03:59 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: use EOPNOTSUPP in hugetlb sysctl handlers |
| |
On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 03:09:50 -0500 (EST) Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Replace ENOTSUPP with EOPNOTSUPP. If hugepages are not supported, > > > this value is propagated to userspace. EOPNOTSUPP is part of uapi > > > and is widely supported by libc libraries. > > > > hm, what is the actual user-visible effect of this change? Does it fix > > some misbehaviour? > > > > It gives nicer message to user, rather than: > # cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages > cat: /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: Unknown error 524 > > And also LTP's proc01 test was failing because this ret code (524) > was unexpected: > proc01 1 TFAIL : proc01.c:396: read failed: /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: errno=???(524): Unknown error 524 > proc01 2 TFAIL : proc01.c:396: read failed: /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages_mempolicy: errno=???(524): Unknown error 524 > proc01 3 TFAIL : proc01.c:396: read failed: /proc/sys/vm/nr_overcommit_hugepages: errno=???(524): Unknown error 524 >
Ah, OK, thanks. "Unknown error 524" is rather rude. I'll queue this for 4.5.
| |