Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:58:39 +0200 | From | jthumshirn <> | Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/2] Update SCSI target removal path |
| |
On 2016-03-30 18:43, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 09:09 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: >> [resend with linux-scsi@ in Cc, my apologies] >> >> This is a follow up to "scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state >> to scsi_target_state". >> >> If anyone has an idea how to create a regression test suite for the >> target removal path I'd be all ears, given the fact that this is the >> 3rd or 4th patch targeting it. > > Actually, could you reverse the order of these patches, please. It's > not safe to revert the soft lockup fix until after the intermediate > state is introduced. I'd rather we didn't go through a point in the > tree where the bug exists again.
You're right. I'll resend the series in reverse order.
| |