lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: (mostly) Arch-independent livepatch
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 01:24:08AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Jessica Yu wrote:
>
> > > v6:
> > > - Since we hard-code the field widths for the objname and symbol name
> > > for the sscanf() calls, which are supposed to correspond to the values
> > > of MODULE_NAME_LEN and KSYM_NAME_LEN, use BUILD_BUG_ON() to detect when
> > > the values of these constants deviate from the expected values.
> > > - Squash the sample livepatch module patch into patch 4
> > > ("livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations") so
> > > git bisects don't break
> > > - Don't need the klp_buf struct, just use plain char arrays to hold the
> > > output of sscanf(). Also, no need to clear the bufs after every
> > > invocation, as sscanf() takes care to put a null byte at the end of
> > > the bufs.
> > > - Fix compiler kbuild errors for the !CONFIG_LIVEPATCH case
> > > - Fixed some small module.c nits
> > >
> >
> > Pinging Rusty, just in case this thread got buried :-)
> > How do the module.c changes look?
>
> Plus there are (admittedly indeed rather small and trivial) changes to
> s390 module loader, so I'd prefer to have Heiko's / Martin's Ack before
> merging this.
>
> Hence, let me piggy back on this ping to Rusty, and let me ping Heiko and
> Martin as well (adding to CC explicitly to make sure this doesn't get lost
> in general noise).

For the s390 changes:
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>

Jessica, thanks for also writing the documentation!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-30 09:41    [W:0.043 / U:1.652 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site