lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v18 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4)
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Volker Lendecke
<Volker.Lendecke@sernet.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:45:14AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:11:03AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > People have long learned that we only have 'alloc' permissions. Any
>> > model that mixes allow and deny ACE is a mistake.
>>
>> People can also learn and change though :-). One of the
>> biggest complaints people deploying Samba on Linux have is the
>> incompatible ACL models.
>
> Just to confirm: I see this a lot in the field. NFSv4 ACLs, while not a
> perfect match for NTFS ACLs are a lot closer much more usable to people
> who want to serve Windows clients.

Yes (and presumably Macs as well)



--
Thanks,

Steve

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-16 05:01    [W:1.705 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site