Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral | From | Javier Martinez Canillas <> | Date | Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:23:38 -0300 |
| |
Hello Joe,
On 03/14/2016 05:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 16:59 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> I don't think they make little sense now since even a non-native english >> speaker like me can understand it :) > > That's a non sequitur if ever I read one. >
I was trying to be funny but it seems that I failed.
>> But yes, it's cryptic at the very least. That's the problem with long text >> and the 80 char limit to make checkpatch.pl happy. I guess I can just move >> the message a little bit even if that will make to not be properly aligned. > > There's no issue with longer than 80 column lines > for these messages. checkpatch wouldn't complain. >
Great, I didn't know that checkpatch had an exception for the 80 column rule. I'll post a v2 then.
Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America
| |