lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/5] x86/msr: Carry on after a non-"safe" MSR access fails without !panic_on_oops
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
>>
>> A couple of the wrmsr users actually care about performance. These
>> are the ones involved in context switching and, to a lesser extent, in
>> switching in and out of guest mode.
>
> .. ok, see the crossed emails.
>
> I'd *much* rather special case the special cases. Not make the generic
> case something complex.

The code in my queue is, literally:

bool ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
{
WARN_ONCE(1, "unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x%x",
(unsigned int)regs->cx);

/* Pretend that the read succeeded and returned 0. */
regs->ip = ex_fixup_addr(fixup);
regs->ax = 0;
regs->dx = 0;
return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe);

The only regard in which this is any more complex than the _safe
variant is because there's a warning (one line of code) and because
the _safe variant forgot to zero the result (two lines of code). My
series fixes the latter, so we're talking about almost no source code
size difference. There *is* a difference in binary size, though --
the _safe variant emits a copy of its fixup every time it appears,
whereas the new fixup appears once.

So I think we should apply my patches (with the early handling fixed
and the panic_on_oops removed), and then consider reimplementing the
_safe variant using fancy handlers to reduce number of lines of asm
and code size, and then consider changing the overall API on top if we
think there's a better API to be had.

Is that okay?

>
> And *particularly* not make the generic case be something where people
> think it's sane to oops and kill the machine. Christ.

I've already removed the panic_on_oops thing from my tree.

--Andy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-14 20:01    [W:0.055 / U:1.552 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site