lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 00/16] Common Dell SMBIOS API
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:20:14AM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 03:48:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 22 January 2016 15:27:12 Michał Kępień wrote:
> > > Note:
> > >
> > > In this series (both v1 and v2) I tried to stick to the overall
> > > concept used in dell-laptop, but in the v1 thread me and Pali also
> > > briefly discussed his alternative ideas [1][2] as to what this API
> > > could look like, so feel free to suggest a different approach.
> > >
> > > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg08260.html
> > > [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg08268.html
> >
> > I would like to hear opinion about dell-smbios API also from other
> > people. Darren, can you look and comment it?
>
> This is an excellently prepared series, nice work Michał.
>
> Most of my concerns were addressed by later patches in the series. I have pushed
> a version of this 1/7 fixed per lkp (linux/io.h) and 7/16 with a corrected body
> as I sent in reply to that patch. This is on my tree as the dell-smbios branch.
>
> My only major concern is module load order dependencies. Inter-module
> dependencies are frowned upon with good reason, the kernel load ordering is
> non-deterministic and it's possible, for example, for dell-laptop to fail to
> find the symbols exported by dell-smbios under certain conditions.
>
> I have worked around this in the past with things like the following:
>
> #ifdef MODULE
> #ifdef CONFIG_FOO_MODULE
> if (request_module("foo"))
> return -ENODEV;
> #endif
> #endif
>
> Something like the above may be necessary for dell-smbios in dell-laptop,
> dell-wmi, and dell-leds now that they depend on the dell-smbios exported
> functions.
>
> Cc Greg in case there is a better way to handle this that I'm not aware of.

No need to request_module anything, the symbol resolution should pull
the dependant module in automagically when you do a 'modprobe',
otherwise the symbols would never be found.

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-08 20:41    [W:0.071 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site