Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:01:39 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> |
| |
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On 02/08/2016 03:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> Now that all review comments have been addressed in patch [3/3], I'm going to >> put this series into linux-next. >> >> There already is 20+ patches on top of it in the queue including fixes for >> bugs that have haunted us for quite some time (and that functionally depend on >> this set) and I'd really like all that to get enough linux-next coverage, so >> there really isn't more time to wait. > > Sorry for the late reply. As Juri mentioned I was OOO last week and > really just got to look at this today. > > One concern I had was, given that the lone scheduler update hook is in > CFS, is it possible for governor updates to be stalled due to RT or DL > task activity?
I don't think they may be completely stalled, but I'd prefer Peter to answer that as he suggested to do it this way.
Peter?
| |