lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks
    From
    On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> wrote:
    > Hi Rafael,
    >
    > On 02/08/2016 03:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    >> Now that all review comments have been addressed in patch [3/3], I'm going to
    >> put this series into linux-next.
    >>
    >> There already is 20+ patches on top of it in the queue including fixes for
    >> bugs that have haunted us for quite some time (and that functionally depend on
    >> this set) and I'd really like all that to get enough linux-next coverage, so
    >> there really isn't more time to wait.
    >
    > Sorry for the late reply. As Juri mentioned I was OOO last week and
    > really just got to look at this today.
    >
    > One concern I had was, given that the lone scheduler update hook is in
    > CFS, is it possible for governor updates to be stalled due to RT or DL
    > task activity?

    I don't think they may be completely stalled, but I'd prefer Peter to
    answer that as he suggested to do it this way.

    Peter?

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2016-02-09 02:21    [W:3.789 / U:0.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site