Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:02:03 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update |
| |
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:04:20AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Sure. ...but you agree that somehow you need a new API call for this, > right? Somehow the PWM regulator needs to be able to say that it > wants the hardware state, not the initial state as specified in the > device tree.
Wouldn't the most direct way to do that be to just not specify anything in the DT? If there *is* something in DT but we ignore it that's a bit weird. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |