Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Feb 2016 16:38:21 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: Get rid of ->governor_enabled and its lock |
| |
On 03-02-16, 11:05, Juri Lelli wrote: > It should be easy to rebase that set (or a part of it) on top of your > and/or Rafael changes. I realize that there are multiple sets of changes > under discussion; so, please tell me how do you, and Rafael, want to > proceed about this.
Yeah, please wait for a bit for Rafael to apply both the series (if they pass the litmus test) to PM tree :)
> But, I guess any other governor that will bypass cpufreq_governor.c, it > will also have to implement such checks. I was just proposing to state > this somewhere, so that we don't forget.
We can surely add a comment for that.
But I would like to review the state after these patches are applied, as we may be able to guarantee that from cpufreq-core instead.
-- viresh
| |