Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:04:03 -0500 (EST) | Subject | Re: Softirq priority inversion from "softirq: reduce latencies" | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:29:39 -0800
> Not really. softirq raised from interrupt context will always execute > on this cpu and not in ksoftirqd, unless load forces softirq loop abort.
That guarantee never was specified.
Or are you saying that by design, on a system under load, your UART will not function properly?
Surely you don't mean that.
| |