Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:07:44 -0800 | From | David Daney <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: Add workaround for Cavium erratum 27456 |
| |
On 02/24/2016 10:06 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:03:02AM -0800, David Daney wrote: >> On 02/24/2016 06:07 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> On 24/02/16 13:40, Will Deacon wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> (and Catalin, if you pick this up, watch out for the conflicts in >>>> cpufeature.h) >>> >>> Yup, that one is about to become a minefield (ARM64_HAS_NO_HW_PREFETCH, >>> ARM64_HAS_UAO, ARM64_ALT_PAN_NOT_UAO and ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN are >>> already happily clashing into -next). But hey, the more the merrier! ;-) >>> >> >> Would you like me to rebase it to for-next/core ? > > I think ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN is in the KVM tree, so you're probably > best off looking at linux-next and choosing your feature number based on > that, whilst basing the patch on either for-next/core or mainline. >
OK, I will do that now.
David.
> Will >
| |