Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: fix comment about return value of cpufreq_register_driver() | Date | Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:15:10 +0100 |
| |
On Monday, February 22, 2016 10:54:46 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 20-02-16, 21:50, Eric Biggers wrote: > > The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea5806d332 > > ("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering"). > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > index e979ec7..bfefc91 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > @@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_enabled); > > * submitted by the CPU Frequency driver. > > * > > * Registers a CPU Frequency driver to this core code. This code > > - * returns zero on success, -EBUSY when another driver got here first > > + * returns zero on success, -EEXIST when another driver got here first > > * (and isn't unregistered in the meantime). > > * > > */ > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Queued up for 4.6, thanks!
| |