Messages in this thread | | | From | Eric Anholt <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] bcm2835 DT changes for 4.6 | Date | Fri, 12 Feb 2016 16:53:52 -0800 |
| |
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> writes:
> On 10/02/2016 10:51, Eric Anholt wrote: >> Martin Sperl <martin@sperl.org> writes: >> >>>> On 09.02.2016, at 01:32, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Florian. Here's the first set of patches for bcm2835 for 4.6. >>>> We've got more DT patches that are going to happen for new boards, >>>> too, but they're still getting polished. >>>> >>>> The following changes since commit 92e963f50fc74041b5e9e744c330dca48e04f08d: >>>> >>>> Linux 4.5-rc1 (2016-01-24 13:06:47 -0800) >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> git@github.com:anholt/linux.git tags/bcm2835-dt-next-2016-02-04 >>>> >>>> for you to fetch changes up to 5ec6f2cd8ec4bcd38ba199ea8711a5ec906d85e7: >>>> >>>> ARM: bcm2835: Add the Raspberry Pi power domain driver to the DT. (2016-02-02 20:02:45 -0800) >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This pull request covers mostly DT changes that didn't make it into >>>> 4.5 because required header files went through other trees. >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Alexander Aring (1): >>>> ARM: bcm2835: Add the Raspberry Pi power domain driver to the DT. >>>> >>>> Lubomir Rintel (1): >>>> ARM: bcm2835: dt: Add Raspberry Pi Model A >>>> >>>> Martin Sperl (2): >>>> ARM: bcm2835: add the auxiliary spi1 and spi2 to the device tree >>>> ARM: bcm2835: follow dt uart node-naming convention >>> >>> Do you want me to resend a rebased version of: >>> ARM: bcm2835: add bcm2835-aux-uart support to default DT >>> >>> The corresponding driver has been added to tty/tty-next. >> >> It hadn't landed last time I checked. A rebased version that you've >> tested would be great! > > OK, please submit this in the next week or so at most, so we can get > this pull request merged, thanks! > > Eric, do you have other changes outside of Device Tree?
We've got bcm2835_defconfig changes that I need to test and tag.
There are also the multi_v7_defconfig updates to enable bcm2835. Would I be pulling those, or someone above me? [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |