Messages in this thread | | | From | "Doug Smythies" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v6 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks | Date | Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:25:18 -0800 |
| |
On 2016.02.11 14:50 Doug Smythies wrote: > On 2016.02.10 22:03 Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: >> On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 03:11:43 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
>>> My test computer has an older model i7 (Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz) >> Thanks Doug. If you have specific workloads, please compare performance.
> My work so far has been testing functionality, with unrealistic workloads specifically > designed to exaggerate issues, in this case the duration problem. > > I'll look at some real world workload scenarios.
Turbostat used for package power, starts before Phoronix tests starts, and ends after Phoronix test ends.
Control Sample: Kernel 4.5-rc3: Phoronix ffmpeg: turbostat 180 Sec. 12.07 Sec. Ave. 27.14 Watts. Phoronix apache: turbostat 200 Sec. 19797.0 R.P.S. Ave. 34.01 Watts. Phoronix kernel: turbostat 180 Sec. 139.93 Sec. 49.09 Watts. Phoronix Postmark (Disk Test): turbostat 200 Sec. 5813 T.P.S. Ave. 21.33 Watts.
Kernel 4.5-rc3 + RJW 3 patch set version 7: Phoronix ffmpeg: turbostat 180 Sec. 11.67 Sec. Ave. 27.35 Watts. Phoronix apache: turbostat 200 Sec. 19430.7 R.P.S. Ave. 34.18 Watts. Phoronix kernel: turbostat 180 Sec. 139.81 Sec. 48.80 Watts. Phoronix Postmark (Disk Test): turbostat 200 Sec. 5683 T.P.S. Ave. 22.41 Watts.
... Doug
| |