lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] pci-hyperv: use kmalloc to allocate hypercall params buffer
On Tue,  8 Nov 2016 14:04:38 -0800
Long Li <longli@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:

> + spin_lock_irqsave(&hbus->retarget_msi_interrupt_lock, flags);
> +
> + params = &hbus->retarget_msi_interrupt_params;
> + memset(params, 0, sizeof(*params));
> + params->partition_id = HV_PARTITION_ID_SELF;
> + params->source = 1; /* MSI(-X) */
> + params->address = msi_desc->msg.address_lo;
> + params->data = msi_desc->msg.data;
> + params->device_id = (hbus->hdev->dev_instance.b[5] << 24) |
> (hbus->hdev->dev_instance.b[4] << 16) |
> (hbus->hdev->dev_instance.b[7] << 8) |
> (hbus->hdev->dev_instance.b[6] & 0xf8) |
> PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn);
> - params.vector = cfg->vector;
> + params->vector = cfg->vector;
>
> for_each_cpu_and(cpu, dest, cpu_online_mask)
> - params.vp_mask |= (1ULL << vmbus_cpu_number_to_vp_number(cpu));
> + params->vp_mask |= (1ULL << vmbus_cpu_number_to_vp_number(cpu));
> +
> + hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT, params, NULL);
>
> - hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT, &params, NULL);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->retarget_msi_interrupt_lock, flags);

It looks like the additional locking here is being overly paranoid.
The caller is already holding the irq descriptor lock. Look at fixup_irqs.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-12-05 17:53    [W:1.321 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site