lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5] cgroup: Add new capability to allow a process to migrate other tasks between cgroups
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:47:19AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> > Control group control? The word control has a specific meaning for
> > cgroups and that second control doesn't make much sense to me.
>
> But this would go against the long tradition of RAS syndrome and
> things like "struct task_struct". :)

Well, now that you put it that way, it's starting to look good. :)
But, let's just go for CAP_CGROUP if everyone is okay with it.

Thanks.

--
tejun

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-12-13 19:53    [W:0.039 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site