Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Dec 2016 13:53:35 -0500 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5] cgroup: Add new capability to allow a process to migrate other tasks between cgroups |
| |
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:47:19AM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > > Control group control? The word control has a specific meaning for > > cgroups and that second control doesn't make much sense to me. > > But this would go against the long tradition of RAS syndrome and > things like "struct task_struct". :)
Well, now that you put it that way, it's starting to look good. :) But, let's just go for CAP_CGROUP if everyone is okay with it.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |