Messages in this thread | | | From | Kevin Hilman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM64: dts: Add support for Meson GXM | Date | Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:06:54 -0800 |
| |
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> writes:
> Following the Amlogic Linux kernel, it seem the only differences > between the GXL and GXM SoCs are the CPU Clusters. > > This commit renames the gxl-s905d-p23x DTSI in a common file for > S905D p20x and S912 q20x boards. > > Then adds a meson-gxm dtsi and reproduce the P23x to Q20x boards > dts files since the S905D and S912 SoCs shares the same pinout > and the P23x and Q20x boards are identical. > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.txt | 6 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/Makefile | 2 + > .../arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gx-p23x-q20x.dtsi | 190 +++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-p200.dts | 19 +++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-p201.dts | 7 + > .../boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905d-p230.dts | 3 +- > .../boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905d-p231.dts | 3 +- > .../boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905d-p23x.dtsi | 188 -------------------- > .../arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxm-s912-q200.dts | 77 +++++++++ > .../arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxm-s912-q201.dts | 58 +++++++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxm.dtsi | 114 +++++++++++++ > 11 files changed, 477 insertions(+), 190 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gx-p23x-q20x.dtsi > delete mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905d-p23x.dtsi > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxm-s912-q200.dts > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxm-s912-q201.dts > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxm.dtsi
Applied.
Git tip: for future reference, set 'git config diff.renames true' so and the diffstat shows a better summary when files are moved/renamed.
e.g, rather than the large ++ and -- above, you'd see:
...gxl-s905d-p23x.dtsi => meson-gx-p23x-q20x.dtsi} | 4 +- Which is much more comforting to a maintainer than a bunch of (potentially unrelated) adds and removes.
Thanks,
Kevin
| |