lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency updates
On 16-11-16, 21:27, Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong.
>
> Both increase and decrease happen at steps.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
> ---
> -> v2
> Remove a trailing space
>
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> index a48b724..7522ec6 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
> @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_step(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
> * sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80%
> * (default), then we try to decrease frequency
> *
> - * Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction
> - * happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency
> + * Frequency updates happen at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum
> + * frequency
> */
> static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

--
viresh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-17 04:41    [W:0.035 / U:0.616 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site