Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:10:28 +0530 | From | Sudip Mukherjee <> | Subject | Re: [LKP] [lkp] [spi] 2baed30cb3: BUG: scheduling while atomic: systemd-udevd/134/0x00000002 |
| |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:15:27AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> writes: > > > Hi Huang, Ying, > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:36:52AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:47:10PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > >> > Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> writes: > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:00:40PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: > >> > >> Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 08:44:37AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > >> <snip> > >> > > > >> > > I am not able to reproduce this. Tested just with the kernel and > >> > > yocto-minimal-i386.cgz filesystem and it booted properly. > >> > > > >> > > I guess I need atleast your job file to reproduce this. > >> > > >> > This is a boot test so I did not attached the job file. But the test > >> > result may depends on specific root file system. For example, the > >> > process when BUG report is always systemd-udevd. Maybe you need a > >> > systemd based root file system. > >> > >> So silly of me. Since you said 2baed30cb3, so i kept looking at that > >> patch. > >> Can you please test again after reverting: > >> ebd43516d387 ("Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay") > >> > >> If it solves the problem then I will submit a formal patch. > > > > Did you get a chance to test it? > > Sorry for late, as the new report just sent. Reverting the specified > commit can solve the issue.
Thanks for the confirmation. But I am still wondering how commit 2baed30cb3 can bring out some issues with ebd43516d387 ? AFAICS they are totally unrelated.
regards sudip
| |