lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] thermal: cpu_cooling: fix out of bounds access in time_in_idle
From
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> wrote:
> Eduardo, Rui,
>
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 07:19:25PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:49:40AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> > On 19-12-15, 12:54, Javi Merino wrote:
>> > > In __cpufreq_cooling_register() we allocate the arrays for time_in_idle
>> > > and time_in_idle_timestamp to be as big as the number of cpus in this
>> > > cpufreq device. However, in get_load() we access this array using the
>> > > cpu number as index, which can result in an out of bound access.
>> > >
>> > > Index time_in_idle{,_timestamp} using the index in the cpufreq_device's
>> > > allowed_cpus mask, as we do for the load_cpu array in
>> > > cpufreq_get_requested_power()
>> > >
>> > > Reported-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
>> > > Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>
>> > > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>> > > Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
>> > > Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 14 ++++++++------
>> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>>
>> If there are no more objections, can you pick this up?
>
> Another gentle ping, can this be merged?

Tested-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-01-18 03:41    [W:0.687 / U:1.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site