lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] gpio: omap: fixes and improvements
    From
    Date
    +Cc: Austin, Philipp

    On 08/26/2015 10:53 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
    > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Grygorii Strashko
    > <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:
    >
    >> This patch series contains set of trivial fixes and improvements, and also
    >> patches which fixes wrong APIs usage in atomic context as for -RT as for
    >> non-RT kernel. The final goal of this series is to make TI OMAP GPIO
    >> driver compatible with -RT kernel as much as possible.
    >>
    >> Patch 1-4: trivial fixes and improvements
    >> Patch 5: fixes wrong CLK clk_prepare/unprepare APIs usage in atomic contexet
    >
    > I've applied patches 1-5 with Santosh's ACK and Tony's Tested-by.
    >
    >> Patch 6(rfc): required to be compatible with -RT kernel, because PM runtime
    >> can't be used in atimic context on -RT.
    >> Patch 7(rfc): This patch converts TI OMAP GPIO driver to use generic irq
    >> handler instead of chained IRQ handler. This way OMAP GPIO driver will be
    >> compatible with RT kernel where it will be forced thread IRQ handler
    >> while in non-RT kernel it still will be executed in HW IRQ context.
    >
    > Waiting for more feedback here.
    >
    > Yours,
    > Linus Walleij
    >

    I've got some feedback here.
    Patches were tested on to of TI -RT tree ti-rt-linux-4.1.y.



    -------- Forwarded Message --------
    Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] gpio: omap: fixes and improvements
    Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 21:42:03 +0000
    From: Austin Schuh <austin@peloton-tech.com>
    To: grygorii.strashko@ti.com
    CC: Philipp Schrader <philipp@peloton-tech.com>

    Hi Grygorii,

    We are running the entire patchset on top of
    a7a6541db840cc4514a26fc12cc1bc94d1b9e873 from the git://
    git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel.git tree. I've pushed the
    system pretty hard overnight and haven't seen any instability (with lockdep
    enabled. We used to get splats pretty fast).

    I wasn't on lkml when you sent the patchset out, so I'm not sure how to
    best reply to the original thread with this info.

    Tested-by: Austin Schuh <austin@peloton-tech.com>

    Austin
    -------- Forwarded Message --------

    --
    regards,
    -grygorii


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2015-09-07 14:01    [W:5.844 / U:0.080 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site