Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:38:58 +0000 (UTC) | From | Mathieu Desnoyers <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] arm64: allocate sys_membarrier system call number |
| |
----- On Sep 2, 2015, at 6:10 AM, Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 06:56:49PM +0100, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> arm64 sys_membarrier number is already wired for arm64 through >> asm-generic/unistd.h, but needs to be allocated separately for >> the 32-bit compability layer of arm64. >> >> [ Untested on this architecture. To try it out: fetch linux-next/akpm, >> apply this patch, build/run a membarrier-enabled kernel, and do make >> kselftest. ] >> >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> >> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >> CC: linux-api@vger.kernel.org >> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> >> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h >> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h >> index cef934a..d97be80 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h >> @@ -797,3 +797,5 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_memfd_create, sys_memfd_create) >> __SYSCALL(__NR_bpf, sys_bpf) >> #define __NR_execveat 387 >> __SYSCALL(__NR_execveat, compat_sys_execveat) >> +#define __NR_membarrier 388 >> +__SYSCALL(__NR_membarrier, sys_membarrier) > > I think people have made similar comments for other architectures, but > please also updated __NR_compat_syscalls when adding new compat syscalls > here.
Thanks for pointing it out! I'm fixing it for the next RFC round.
Mathieu
> Will
-- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
| |