Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Sep 2015 22:49:49 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: Trivial clocksource driver |
| |
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> writes: > > > On 29/09/2015 20:32, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Mason wrote: > >> > >>> I am trying to submit a new ARM port, and Arnd pointed out that the > >>> clocksource code could not live in arch/arm/$PLATFORM, but had to > >>> move to drivers/clocksource (and it had to support DT). > >>> > >>> Did I understand correctly? Is this the right place to submit code > >>> as provided below? > >> > >> Yes, drivers/clocksource is the right place. You just need to submit a > >> formal patch, which includes a proper subject line, changelog, plus > >> the necessary Makefile and Kconfig modifications. > > > > OK, I'll send a formal patch tomorrow. > > There are no Kconfig modifications, is that OK? > > Why don't you use my driver? It's even simpler, and it works just fine > on the 87xx chip. > > https://github.com/mansr/linux-tangox/blob/master/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-tangox.c
Perhaps because that driver is not upstream either?
Thanks,
tglx | |