Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Baoquan He <> | Subject | [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Adjsut the return value of the parse_ioapics_under_ir | Date | Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:26:09 +0800 |
| |
Adjust the return value of parse_ioapics_under_ir as "-1" representing failure and "0" representing succcess. Just make it consistent with other function implementation, and we can judge if calling is successfull by if (!parse_ioapics_under_ir()) style.
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> --- drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c b/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c index 37b93f5..0f441b7 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c @@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ static int __init intel_prepare_irq_remapping(void) if (!dmar_ir_support()) return -ENODEV; - if (parse_ioapics_under_ir() != 1) { + if (!parse_ioapics_under_ir()) { pr_info("Not enabling interrupt remapping\n"); goto error; } @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ static int __init parse_ioapics_under_ir(void) } if (!ir_supported) - return 0; + return -1; for (ioapic_idx = 0; ioapic_idx < nr_ioapics; ioapic_idx++) { int ioapic_id = mpc_ioapic_id(ioapic_idx); @@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ static int __init parse_ioapics_under_ir(void) } } - return 1; + return 0; } static int __init ir_dev_scope_init(void) -- 2.1.0
| |