Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: assign signed result to unsigned variable | From | SF Markus Elfring <> | Date | Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:52:20 +0200 |
| |
> Your approach finds a function definition.
Yes. - I assumed that it might also be relevant.
> My approach works on the call directly, using whatever type information is available.
The connection between the SmPL specification "f(...)@e" and the desired return type was not obvious for me so far.
Regards, Markus
| |