Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:39:12 -0400 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: PIDs Controller Limit |
| |
Hello, Aleksa.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:42:38AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > Does it make sense for the PIDs controller to allow a user to set a > limit of 0? Since we don't cancel attaches, a limit of 0 doesn't > affect anything (nothing stops attaches, and you need to have a > process in the PIDs cgroup in order for fork()s to be affected by the > limit). So I think that attempting to set pid.limit to 0 should return > an -EINVAL.
I don't know. Why does it matter?
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |