Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:43:40 +0200 | From | David Sterba <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: avoid passing int param to start_transaction which takes u64 |
| |
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 04:33:07PM +0300, Alexandru Moise wrote: > > I think it's better to do it the other way around, ie. let all the > > equivalents of 'num_items' be an int. We know that this is a small > > number, using u64 for that is an overkill. As the number is always > > positive, please make it 'unsigned'. > > So you'd want it to be "unsigned int" or "u32"?
'unsigned int' please
| |