lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] clocksource: rockchip: Make the driver more readability and compatible
Hi Daniel,

在 2015年09月18日 15:55, Daniel Lezcano 写道:
> On 09/17/2015 12:19 PM, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2015年09月17日 18:06, Daniel Lezcano 写道:
>>> On 09/17/2015 11:28 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 在 2015年09月17日 17:11, Daniel Lezcano 写道:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Caesar,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/17/2015 09:51 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>>>>> Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform,
>>>>>> There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> logs:
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> drivers/clocksource/rockchip_timer.c:156:13: error: 'NO_IRQ'
>>>>>> undeclared
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the NO_IRQ definition is missing for ARM64.
>>>>
>>>> Yep, Maybe better to compatible if we don't use the 'NO_IRQ',
>>>
>>> Hmm, after digging into drivers/of/irq.c and kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
>>>
>>> when there is an error it returns zero. So NO_IRQ and -1 are not
>>> correct and on the other side zero can be a valid irq. That sounds a
>>> little bit fuzzy to me.
>>
>> I believe the 'NO_IRQ' is better select if 'NO_IRQ' is defined on ARM64
>> platform.
>>
>> irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
>>
>> if (irq == NO_IRQ)
>> ...
>> Also, that's ok if we instead of the 'irq < 0' or '!irq' , right?
>
>
> Hi Caesar,
>
> so regarding Thomas and Russel answers, let's replace NO_IRQ by '!irq'.

Fixed, I will send the patch v1.

>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Daniel
>
>

--
Thanks,
Caesar



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-18 10:41    [W:0.072 / U:1.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site