lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/4] m68k: Wire up direct ipc calls
From
Hi Andreas,

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>> You mean that we should drop "select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION",
>> but we can't do that because an indirect call through sys_ipc() would
>> still need it when dispatching to sys_{sem,shm,msg}ctl()?
>
> Yes. But all architectures that currently use both sys_ipc and
> ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION would benefit from decoupling it when they
> add the direct syscalls.

Do we currently have architectures that use both sys_ipc and the direct
syscalls, where keeping ipc_parse_version() in the direct syscalls is required?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-09-17 17:41    [W:0.068 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site