Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:18:53 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] m68k: Wire up direct ipc calls | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> |
| |
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes: >> You mean that we should drop "select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION", >> but we can't do that because an indirect call through sys_ipc() would >> still need it when dispatching to sys_{sem,shm,msg}ctl()? > > Yes. But all architectures that currently use both sys_ipc and > ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION would benefit from decoupling it when they > add the direct syscalls.
Do we currently have architectures that use both sys_ipc and the direct syscalls, where keeping ipc_parse_version() in the direct syscalls is required?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |