Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | lizf@kernel ... | Subject | [PATCH 3.4 131/146] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer | Date | Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:04:06 +0800 |
| |
From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
3.4.109-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream.
The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority, so correct it.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com> --- kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c index a5457d5..6ad2e2d 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void) if (producer_fifo >= 0) { struct sched_param param = { - .sched_priority = consumer_fifo + .sched_priority = producer_fifo }; sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m); } else -- 1.9.1
| |