Messages in this thread | | | From | Paul Moore <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V1] audit: add warning that an old auditd may be starved out by a new auditd | Date | Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:37:56 -0400 |
| |
On Sunday, September 13, 2015 12:08:19 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 15/09/11, Paul Moore wrote: > > Although I suppose if nothing else we could send a record indicating > > that another auditd attempted to replace it ... if we can send it > > great, drop the new request and be glad we audited it, if we can't > > send it, reset the auditd tracking. > > This is actually a good idea.
This would go well with your last patch to try harder on netlink send failures. On a related note, with the merge window closed I just rotated the audit tree so that patch is now in linux-audit#next.
-- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
| |