Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 12 Sep 2015 10:41:23 -0700 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/11] 3.10.88-stable review |
| |
On 09/12/2015 08:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:56:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.88 release. >>> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Sun Sep 13 22:45:08 UTC 2015. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> Compiled and booted on x86_32. No errors in dmesg. >> >> cross_compiled with allmodconfig: >> >> i386 - pass >> x86_64 - pass >> alphacheck - pass >> arm - pass >> cris - failed > > Is this expected? > I don't test this one.
>> m68k - pass >> mips - pass >> powerpc - pass >> s390 - failed > > Is this expected? > Yes.
>> sparc - pass >> sparc64 - pass >> tile - failed >> tilegx - failed
Yes. Looks like it was fixed somewhere between 3.11 and 3.13, though I did not track down the commit.
>> xtensa - failed >
xtensa:allmodconfig builds for me, using my own toolchain. I see that kind of failure if I build for one endianness, then for the other, without cleaning up in between.
Guenter
> Are these all new failures? > > thanks, > > greg k-h >
| |