lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [RFC] sdhci: fix DMA leaks [was: [SHDCI] Heavy (thousands) DMA leaks]
Date
I will format a patch based on your diff file firstly. I will test this on my side,
If any issue, like dma issue or performance issue, I will add some modification.
Then I will send the patch for review, and you can test the patch on your platform.

Best Regards
Haibo Chen


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiri Slaby [mailto:jslaby@suse.cz]
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 5:07 PM
> To: Chen Haibo-B51421; Ulf Hansson
> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; Linux kernel mailing list
> Subject: Re: [RFC] sdhci: fix DMA leaks [was: [SHDCI] Heavy (thousands)
> DMA leaks]
>
> On 08/06/2015, 09:42 AM, Chen Bough wrote:
> > I read your attached log and patch, yes, dma memory leak will happen
> > when more than one pre_request execute. The method of ++next->cookie
> > is not good, your patch seems good, but I still need some time to test
> > the patch, because you unmap the dma in sdhci_finish_data rather than
> the sdhci_post_req.
>
> Hi,
>
> yes, this is not correct. We can perhaps differentiate according to the
> COOKIE value. Should I fix it or are you going to prepare a patch based
> on my RFC?
>
> thanks,
> --
> js
> suse labs
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-08-06 11:41    [W:0.244 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site