Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:06:22 +0200 | Subject | Re: [RFC v6 10/40] richacl: Permission check algorithm | From | Andreas Grünbacher <> |
| |
2015-08-28 23:49 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: >> + /* >> + * We don't care which class the process is in when the acl is >> + * not masked. >> + */ >> + in_owner_or_group_class = 1; > > So why bother setting it at all, then? Oh, I see, it lets you break out > of the loop below earlier. OK.
Comment changed to:
/* * When the acl is not masked, there is no need to determine if * the process is in the group class and we can earlier break * out of the loop below. */
> Patch makes sense to me, ACK.
Thanks, Andreas
| |