lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC v6 10/40] richacl: Permission check algorithm
From
2015-08-28 23:49 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>> + /*
>> + * We don't care which class the process is in when the acl is
>> + * not masked.
>> + */
>> + in_owner_or_group_class = 1;
>
> So why bother setting it at all, then? Oh, I see, it lets you break out
> of the loop below earlier. OK.

Comment changed to:

/*
* When the acl is not masked, there is no need to determine if
* the process is in the group class and we can earlier break
* out of the loop below.
*/

> Patch makes sense to me, ACK.

Thanks,
Andreas


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-08-29 00:21    [W:0.071 / U:1.624 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site