Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Aug 2015 15:17:10 +0800 | From | Dongsheng Yang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ubifs: Allow O_DIRECT |
| |
On 08/24/2015 03:18 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 15:34 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>>> Basically, we need to see what is the "common practice" here, and >>>> follow it. This requires a small research. What would be the most >>>> popular Linux FS which does not support direct I/O? Can we check >>>> what >>>> it does? >>> >>> All popular filesystems seem to support direct IO. >>> That's the problem, application do not expect O_DIRECT to fail. >>> >>> My intention was to do it like exofs: >> >> Fair enough, thanks! >> >> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@intel.com> > > Richard, you mention this was suggested by Dave, could you please pint > to the discussion, if possible?
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-August/060702.html
That's in a discussion I want to introduce ubifs into xfstests.
Yang > > Artem. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > . >
| |