Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Javier Martinez Canillas <> | Subject | [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: max77686: Use a generic name for the PMIC node in the example | Date | Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:47:19 +0200 |
| |
The ePAPR standard says that: "the name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming model."
So, change the max77686 binding document example to use a generic node name instead of using the chip's name.
Suggested-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
Changes in v4: - Add Lee Jones Acked-by tag to patch #2.
Changes in v3: - Fix typo in ePAPR document name. Suggested by Sergei Shtylyov
Changes in v2: None
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt index 8221102d3fc2..d2ed3c20a5c3 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ to get matched with their hardware counterparts as follow: Example: - max77686@09 { + max77686: pmic@09 { compatible = "maxim,max77686"; interrupt-parent = <&wakeup_eint>; interrupts = <26 0>; -- 2.4.3
| |