Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:55:51 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq: Fix coding style issues |
| |
On 23-08-15, 22:13, Muhammad Falak R Wani wrote: > This patch introduces a blank line after declarations, which > fix the checkpatch.pl warnings at 3 places. > > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index 8ae655c..5aea659 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -718,6 +718,7 @@ static ssize_t show_bios_limit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf) > { > unsigned int limit; > int ret; > + > if (cpufreq_driver->bios_limit) { > ret = cpufreq_driver->bios_limit(policy->cpu, &limit); > if (!ret) > @@ -815,6 +816,7 @@ unlock: > static void cpufreq_sysfs_release(struct kobject *kobj) > { > struct cpufreq_policy *policy = to_policy(kobj); > + > pr_debug("last reference is dropped\n"); > complete(&policy->kobj_unregister); > } > @@ -2129,6 +2131,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_unregister_governor); > int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu) > { > struct cpufreq_policy *cpu_policy; > + > if (!policy) > return -EINVAL;
We don't really need a patch for this, unless Rafael wants to apply this one :)
-- viresh
| |