Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:06:49 +0530 | From | Pankaj Dubey <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove SROM related register settings from mach-exynos |
| |
Hi Krzysztof,
On Wednesday 27 May 2015 05:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > W dniu 29.04.2015 o 17:38, Pankaj Dubey pisze: >> As now we have dedicated driver for SROM controller, it will take care >> of saving register banks during S2R so we can safely remove these >> settings from mach-exynos. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 2 + >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 10 ----- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 3 -- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 20 +--------- >> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/map-s5p.h | 1 - >> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-srom.h | 54 -------------------------- >> 6 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-srom.h >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig >> index 603820e..e842b23 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig >> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ menuconfig ARCH_EXYNOS >> select S5P_DEV_MFC >> select SRAM >> select MFD_SYSCON >> + select SOC_SAMSUNG >> + select EXYNOS_SROM > > What about the difference of execution time? The suspend/resume of > device may not be called in the same time as previous syscore ops. Does > this have any impact? >
I had tested it for S2R at that time on SMDK5250 board and it was fine. I do not noticed any issue in S2R, so I feel timing should not have any impact.
Thanks, Pankaj Dubey
> Best regards, > Krzysztof > >
| |